7 Common Types of Leadership Styles (Plus How to find your own)

In this session, we will discuss 7 common types of leadership and their advantages and disadvantages.

7 Types of Leadership styles

Types of Leadership styles are deal with the other ways leaders influence their followers. It can be boss-centered, subordinate-centered, or relation. Leadership styles affect by their job performance. Lewyn’s leaders’ styles are.

Types of Leadership Styles are summarized here

1. Autocratic Style of leadership
2. Democratic style of leadership
3. Situational style of leadership
4. Coaching style of leadership
5. Transformational style of leadership
6. Transactional style of leadership
7. Delegative style of leadership

Autocratic types of Leadership style

The Phrase is most power and decision-making are centralized in the leaders. Generally, an autocratic leader believes that he or she is the smartest person at the table and knows more than others. They often make decisions alone or with a small, trusted group and they’re asked.

In the organization how to benefit because there is available autocratic leadership style. These types of leadership are generally very rigid, but in situational that demand structure, quick decision making, and close supervision.

Here are some features of autocratic leadership

• Make all the decision by the leaders They orders what to do and how to do then subordinates are not consulted.
• Position-based authority and responsibility have leaders. They demand total obedience from subordinates. Influence flows from leaders to followers. Authority and Responsibility are centralized in the leader.
• In the organization, employees take rewards and punishments from leaders. Information is controlled by the leaders.

Advantages of Autocratic types of leadership styles

1. Quick decision-making provides because there is only one person can take decision and that one is a leader.
2. Effective in crisis and emergency situations achieve higher productivity in the short-run at the factory floor.
3. Most subordinates like to work under the centralized authority and strict supervision.
4. The chain of command is clear. It is understood by all.
5. In the organization, there is always maintaine discipline.

The disadvantage of Autocratic types of leadership styles

1. Decision-making is ignore in participation by subordinates.
2. Instructions issued without consulting the person who is performing the job.
3. Teamwork is need where it is effective.
4. They tend to evade responsibility and initiative by subordinates.
5. People feel committed to goals if they result in high morale and productivity.

Democratic types of Leadership styles

The phrase is most power and decision-making are decentralize. Discussion consultation and participation are encourage. A democratic leader is someone who shares information with employees about anything that affects their work responsibility. Before approving a final decision they also seek employment opinions. Because team members feel their voice is heard and their contributions matter. A democratic leadership style’s influence flows both ways from leader to follow and follower to leader.

Because this types of leadership style are numerous benefits to this participative. Also, this type of leadership can engender trust and promote team spirit and cooperation from employees. A democratic leadership style can be a great choice for a smaller team or a team composed of similarly skilled members.

You may be a democratic leader.

1. Consult with subordinates about the decision
2. Delegated to subordinates
3. Provide information to the team when making the decision
4. Flows both ways from leaders to follower and follower to leader
5. Promote a work environment where everyone shares their ideas
6. good at mediation
7. Are flexible
8. Are retinal

Advantages of Democratic types of leadership

1. decision making also subordinates involved promotes participation.
2. Teamwork is need where effective
3. Results in productivity and high morale. people feel committed to goals. Motive subordinates.
4. Provides opportunities for the development and growth of subordinates. creativity is encouraged.

Disadvantages of democratic types of leadership styles

1. This type of leadership is time-consuming, slow, and cumbersome
2. Democratic style can result in indiscipline
3. Also In this type of leadership style of leaders may avoid responsibility.

Situational types of Leadership styles

Hersey and Blanchard’s leadership styles are one of the best-known situational theories. Situational theories of leadership stress the significant influence of the environments and situations on leadership. First published in 1969, this model describes four primary styles of leadership including.

In others words, leadership style should change according to the demands of the situation. There is no one style that is the best for all situations. leaders’ behavior should be situational. there is no universally applicable leader behavior. Group performance determines leadership effectiveness. Structure of task, leader-led relations, and position power of leader are the situational variables that affect leadership style.

This theory focuses on the follower’s readiness. Successful leadership is achieved by selecting the right leadership style. The right leadership style is contingent on the level of follower’s readiness or maturity. The followers accept or reject a leader. leadership effectiveness depends on the actions of followers.

This theory uses a combination of task and relationship orientations to identify four major situational styles of leadership.

1. Telling style: High in task and high in relationship orientation. This is effective when followers are on the low side of maturity.
2. Selling Style: High in task and high in relationship orientation. This is effective when followers are on the low side of maturity.
3. Participating style: Low in task and high in relationship orientation. This is effective when followers are on the high side of maturity.
4. Delegating style: Low in the task and low in relationship orientation. This is effective when followers are at a very high level of maturity. The leadership style should vary with the situation or the level of maturity of the followers.

Coaching types of leadership styles

The coaching style of leadership is when a leader coaches team members to develop themselves. Coaching leadership focus on improving implying better individual and professional in a long term. It has the power to do extraordinary things export business, instruction, sales, and many other things.

The Coaching leadership is explained by the denial government as a method of developing team members of a time. This creates an engagement build relationship and the future improvement of the team member by the coach.

The four-element of coaching types of leadership styles.

Coaching is an art. it is compelling and easy to fail at some key elements care to restack are required in order to create success enable the platform. coaching leadership depends have a lay of leadership’s ability to direct and support. The elements of coaching leadership.

1. Collaboration: A coach who created a successful team at a time doesn’t collaborate. it was about maintaining higher starters and more about supporting what was best for the team. Sure the coach gave direction to the help of team members develop their skills but this is stile collaborate an environment.
2. Coaching Mindset: Helping people become the best self in a simple task. A coach thing creatively about approaching the coaching classes to develop team members. So that team collectively the best result. it a process of great commitment and sacrifices.
3. Scaffolding: Scaffolding refers to a variety of instructional techniques used to move students progressively toward stronger understanding and ultimately, greater independence in the learning process.

Transformational types of leadership styles

Transforming and improving upon the company’s conventions is always done by transformational leadership. It is often identified as the single most effective style. The transformational leadership style was first described during the late 1970s and later expanded upon by researcher Bernard M. Bass. These leaders are able to motive and inspire followers and direct positive changes in the group.

In the other words, this style doesn’t require the leader to be present to effect change because the leader initiates transformation through the organization and motivates employees to perform. It demands a high level of productivity and involvement from employees.

When these types of leaders starting a job all employees might get a list of goals to reach. as well as deadlines for reaching them. while the goals might simple at first, this manager might pick up the pace of deadlines or give you more and more challenging goals as you grow with the company.

Transactional types of leadership styles

In simple words, the transactional style of leadership stems from the notion that employment and specific projects are transactional. like that when a company opens a vacancy then an employee accepts a job, she/he agrees to obey the leader and complete the tasks and duties as assigned and will be compensated in exchange for his/her efforts. then the workers may get rewards and punished based on their performance under this kind of leadership. The role is well-defined and people who are ambitious and respond to rewards are likely to do well.

In other words, transactional leadership is one of that leadership where we can exchange anything. like that when you starting a job with a transactional boss. you might receive an incentive plan that motives you to quickly master your regular job duties. for example, if you are working in the marketing department, then you might receive a bonus for sending 10 marketing emails. so that if you watch a transformational leader might only offer you a bonus if your work results is a large amount of newsletter subscription.

Relates articles

1. Positive and Negative Effects of the Industrial Revolution
2. What is the Business definition, features, types, importance
3. What is organizational behavior? definition, meaning, features, types
4. Definition of quality circle | features, objective, techniques, benefits
5. Effective Time Management Techniques